Attacking President Obama for lacking sufficient testosterone in his comments to date on the ruckus in Iran, Ed Morrissey, writing at Hot Air, manages to combine Dumbness with I-Haven’t-Been-Paying-Atttention-ness.
His general theme is the neocon rant du jour, that Obama is not basing his response to the Iranian crisis on an old John Wayne flick. He cites Glenn Kessler in the Washington Post asserting that Obama is “calibrating” his comments in order to “avoid having the demonstrators accused of being American stooges” and wants to “preserve the possibility of negotiating directly with the Iranian government…”
Leaving aside the implicit assumption that Kessler speaks for the Obama administration, Morrissey seems shocked at the notion that an American president would actually consider the impact of his comments before opening his mouth, otherwise known as calibrating. I guess if you spent eight years in pig heaven with a president whose first concern when speaking in public was to avoid biting off his own tongue that might seem odd to you.
Morrissey also seems to ignore the fact that Khamenei and Ahmadinejad are, in fact, calling the shots in Iran at the moment. If he thinks that the U.S. should avoid talking to Iran regardless of who is in charge, then Morrissey should just say that. If so, perhaps he might explain how the kind of presidential chest thumping he seems to want is going to change Iranian policy regardless of who is in charge.
In the not-paying-attention category, Morrissey opines that it is useless to fret about “the mullahs” linking the reformists with the U.S.: “The mullahs aren’t going to go for it anyway. They need big-time scapegoats to explain big-time repression. We can expect the mullahs to blame the US and Israel for this crisis…”
Truth is, “the mullahs” have already blamed the U.S. So, Morrissey gets a point for having a clue about Iranian propaganda tropes, but he loses a point for not keeping up with the news.
Finally, the headline to Morrissey”s piece is “Can Obama still want talks with Iranian mullahs?”, as if to suggest that Mousavi and other folks, like Rafsanjani, are not also “mullahs”. That suggests either much ignorance of contemporary Iran or wholesale wishful thinking. Mousavi is leading a reform movement within an Islamic Republic context. We simply have no reason to believe he would launch a Western-style democratic era in Iran.
The subtext of Morrissey’s criticisms of Obama, and of the other right-wing attacks, is that if Obama merely wagged his finger and yelled at the hardliners they would withdraw from the scene in panic, to be replaced by a Mousavi who has always really been a card-carrying member of the American Enterprise institute.
Silly boys.